Theory of Mind (ToM), the ability to understand people's minds based on their behavior, is key to developing socially intelligent agents. Current approaches to ToM reasoning either rely on prompting Large Language Models (LLMs), which are prone to systematic errors, or use handcrafted, rigid agent models for model-based inference, which are more robust but fail to generalize across domains. In this work, we introduce AutoToM, an automated agent modeling method for scalable, robust, and interpretable mental inference. Given a ToM problem, AutoToM first proposes an initial agent model and then performs automated Bayesian inverse planning based on this model, leveraging an LLM backend.

Federated Multi-Task Learning (FL-MTL) enables clients with heterogeneous data to collaboratively train models capable of handling multiple downstream tasks. However, FL-MTL faces key challenges, including statistical heterogeneity, task interference, and the need to balance local learning with global knowledge sharing. Traditional methods like FedAvg struggle in such settings due to the lack of explicit mechanisms to address these issues. In this paper, we propose FedRAM, a threestep framework that progressively updates two scalar hyperparameters: the task importance weight and the client aggregation coefficient. FedRAM introduces a reference-proxy-agent strategy, where the proxy model serves as an intermediate between the local reference model and the global agent model. This design reduces the need for repeated local training while preserving local performance. Extensive experiments on six real-world FL-MTL benchmarks show that FedRAM improves performance by at least 3% over the most baseline on both in-domain and outof-domain tasks, while reducing computational cost by 15 . These results make FedRAM a robust and practical solution for large-scale FL-MTL applications. The code is available at https://github.com/wwffvv/FedRAM.

Theory of Mind (ToM), the ability to understand people's minds based on their behavior, is key to developing socially intelligent agents. Current approaches to ToM reasoning either rely on prompting Large Language Models (LLMs), which are prone to systematic errors, or use handcrafted, rigid agent models for model-based inference, which are more robust but fail to generalize across domains. In this work, we introduce, an automated agent modeling method for scalable, robust, and interpretable mental inference. Given a ToM problem, first proposes an initial agent model and then performs automated Bayesian inverse planning based on this model, leveraging an LLM backend.

Recent endeavors towards directly using large language models (LLMs) as agent models to execute interactive planning tasks have shown commendable results.

Imitating humans' mental world knowledge model which provides global prior knowledge before the task and maintains local dynamic knowledge during the task, in this paper, we introduce parametric W orld K nowledge M odel ( WKM) to facilitate agent

The challenge of finding compromises between agent proposals is fundamental to AI sub-fields such as argumentation, mediation, and negotiation. Building on this tradition, Elkind et al. (2021) introduced a process for coalition formation that seeks majority-supported proposals preferable to the status quo, using a metric space where each agent has an ideal point. The crucial step in this iterative process involves identifying compromise proposals around which agent coalitions can unite. How to effectively find such compromise proposals, however, remains an open question. We address this gap by formalizing a holistic model that encompasses agent bounded rationality and uncertainty and developing AI models to generate such compromise proposals. We focus on the domain of collaboratively writing text documents -- e.g., to enable the democratic creation of a community constitution. We apply NLP (Natural Language Processing) techniques and utilize LLMs (Large Language Models) to create a semantic metric space for text and develop algorithms to suggest suitable compromise points. To evaluate the effectiveness of our algorithms, we simulate various coalition formation processes and demonstrate the potential of AI to facilitate large-scale democratic text editing, such as collaboratively drafting a constitution, an area where traditional tools are limited.

Imitating humans' mental world knowledge model which provides global prior knowledge before the task and maintains local dynamic knowledge during the task, in this paper, we introduce parametric W orld K nowledge M odel ( WKM) to facilitate agent